Law Factual Summary

actual Summary Susie is a barbarian, who take on to meet friends at a commoning lot at 1 1 pm, when the city law distinctly states that a curfew is obligate for anyone after 1 1 pm in the park. police officer ruthless enforced the law, tho and the law in addition states that a person can get In back of a camping bus with no seat belt. Jerry a minor with little to no driving cognition skills was giving Susie and Kathy a ride. The add together metre from the Incident to when the truck got In disaster was 1 hour and a half, Susie lived a mile from the park.The officer loud of every escorted Susie home thusly not make the Incident, or let her walk. But In the end each person Is authorise to their mistakes. Legal Issues In the moorage of Susie v urban center of Elsewhere and incumbent Ruthless, Is It failure In the part of Susie and her friends fill emergeing that they were violating the 1 1 Mom curfew for being In the park? Was Officer Ruthless besides at charge for neglecting the comment that Susie tell to him, she only lived a few blocks from the park, and not escorting or letting her go home to prevent the accident?The last(a) questions, I as a justice would ask, is during the one and half hour fourth dimension span from when the minor league were told to leave the park by Officer Ruthless, What events occurred to make the driver get in an accident? Did the minors partake in illegal activities, I. E. beverage and driving, or illegal drugs? Was there a toxicology report filed from the scene of the crime? in that respect are many avenues of approach that I as a Judge would postulate to know such as reports to decently handle and file who is at smirch in this wooing.Without the actual evidence from some(prenominal) sides, it will be unclear to know who is liable and who is not. Legal Concept This case is based on the legal imagination of minors breaking the law, which in this take was the 1 1 Mom curfew. They had know of this law and yet morally aim not to obey it, and instead of leaving home as instructed by Officer Ruthless, Susie mark, and her two friends decided to hang out for another(prenominal) hour and a half, thus declarationing in the accident. In the state which this case is filed in, the law states it is k to have a passenger ride in the ward-heeler of the truck without a settable.Certain laws need to be revamped since this is clearly now a true(p) way to transport passengers, particularly after midnight, when most accidents tend to occur. Analysis/ determination With properly reading the statements from both Susie label and Officer Ruthless, It Is clear that even though the Officer had told all the parties snarly with Susie to leave, they choose to do other activities not relating to the park. The City of Elsewhere and Officer Ruthless cannot be at fault for the duration amid 1 1 MOM and the time of the accident.The officer did his Job by obeying the laws and guidelines and Susie and her friends clearly did what they precious to and as a result got Involved In the accident. Justice is wile but It Is the duty of each several(prenominal) to nerve out for one another In the Interest of life. Negligence on Susie label and her friends behalf led to the accident. Law Factual Summary By greengrocerys ruthless enforced the law, but and the law too states that a person can ride in back was giving Susie and Kathy a ride.The total time from the incident to when the truck to in accident was 1 hour and a half, Susie lived a mile from the park. The officer could of either escorted Susie home thus not make the incident, or let her walk, but in the end each person is empower to their mistakes. Legal Issues In the case of Susie v City of Elsewhere and Officer Ruthless, is it inadvertence in the part of Susie and her friends knowing that they were violating the 1 1 Mom curfew for being in the park? Was Officer Ruthless also at fault for neglecting the comment especia lly after midnight, when most accidents tend to occur.Analysis/ stopping point With properly reading the statements from both Susie Marks and Officer Ruthless, it is clear that even though the Officer had told all the parties involved with Susie to and Officer Ruthless cannot be at fault for the time between 1 1 MOM and the time of and her friends clearly did what they wanted to and as a result got involved in the accident. Justice is blind but it is the duty of each individual to look out for one another in the interest of life. Negligence on Susie Marks and her friends behalf led